Thursday, April 23, 2009

Friendship Park (and a note on politics)

(NOTE: What follows is an endorsement of legislation in the US Congress. That would make this a political endorsement, although that a political statement is not my intent. We haven't really discussed immigration yet, and I realize there are diverse and strongly-held views as to what is the most just immigration policy. If you think I've unwisely given cover to a destructive and unjust approach, I'll give rebuttals their own post. If at any time, you feel that this blog or our book club is being unduly influenced by prevailing political winds, rather than creating them, please speak up and voice your displeasure. I've always hated any appearance of church sanction for political parties or politicians. At the same time, I the issues we are discussing in these books, the conclusions we will draw, and (I pray) the actions we will take are going to strike many observers as sideways politics. If they don't, there's a good chance we've missed something. I highly recommend these two messages on Jesus and politics, and this one on immigration, from previous Tough Questions series at Coast.)

Last Sunday, Kristine said that, although Friendship Park has been shut down, that increasing pressure might force the Border Patrol to rescind its decision and reopen the park. At this point, much of it has been torn up, so it might take some money. Just today, then, I was pleased to read that Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona has introduced legislation that would
1. Require the Department of Homeland Security to consult with federal land managers and state, local, and tribal governments in creating a Border Protection Strategy that supports border security efforts while also protecting federal and tribal lands.

2. Provide for flexibility, rather than a “one size fits all” approach, to border security by allowing experts at DHS to decide upon best strategies for border security.

3. Allow land managers, local officials, and local communities to have a say in border security decisions, requiring full public notice and participation.

4. Ensure that laws intended to protect air, water, wildlife, culture, and health and safety are fully upheld. "

While Friendship Park is not specifically mentioned, it could be if our elected representatives hear enough about it. Write your representative and urge them to legislate the reopening of Friendship Park. Post your drop in the bucket in the comments!

1 comment:

  1. Here's what I've sent. Copy and paste and/or adjust it as you wish.

    I am writing to voice concern about the closing of Friendship Park on the U.S.- Mexican border. I understand there are arguments in favor of tearing out the park in order to increase security, but these arguments should not prevail over maintaining a symbolic space on the San Diego - Tijuana border which says we are local and national communities which are intricately linked. This public space represents a deep history and a necessary camaraderie. Since Operation Gatekeeper was enacted in 1994, the park has not marked a high volume area for illegal border crossing. However, it does remain a place where people on both sides of the border can meet in a peaceful, legal manner, and this space should be preserved for those who choose to build community between borders, across arbitrary lines, and beyond national identity.

    Your San Diego constituents, of which I am one, would appreciate you taking an active stand against the destruction of this park.

    ReplyDelete